Gateway comparison

XPayr vs Speed (TrySpeed)

A direct comparison for merchants evaluating crypto checkout, wallet settlement, stablecoin rails, fees, API/webhooks, testnet evaluation, and operational payment records.

TL;DR

Choose by operating model, not just feature count.

Switch when you want 100% non-custodial direct wallet finality across Solana, Base, Arbitrum, EURC, and TRON USDT at a flat 0.5% fee.

Pricing snapshot

Fee comparison needs context.

Speed (tryspeed.com) is a custodial Bitcoin Lightning & USDT processor charging up to 1.0% on merchant checkouts/withdrawals while holding received balances inside a custodial Speed account.

XPayr charges a flat 0.5% gateway fee per successful transaction before network gas, swap, bridge, or third-party route costs.

Speed official pricing
At a glance

Where each platform fits

Decision areaXPayrSpeed (TrySpeed)
Custody & balance model 100% non-custodial — 99.5% settles immediately to your own wallet. Custodial Speed account ledger requiring external withdrawals.
Multi-chain coverage Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, BSC, Solana, TRON, BTC, ETH, Circle Arc. Primarily Bitcoin/Lightning + limited USDT custodial rails.
Checkout & Payout fee Flat 0.5% (50 bps) gateway fee; $0 XPayr withdrawal fee. Free tier caps + up to 1.0% processing/payout fees.
AI & Licensing stack 21-tool MCP server, Google A2A Card, HTTP 402 kit, ES256 License Kit. Standard REST checkout links and plugins.
AI Agent & MCP Server Integration Official 21-tool Model Context Protocol server (@xpayr/mcp-server on NPM & Official Anthropic MCP Registry io.github.xpayrcom/xpayr-mcp-server), OpenAPI 3.1.0 playground (api-docs.xpayr.com), and policy-controlled AI agent commerce. Check official provider documentation for current AI agent or MCP protocol support.
XPayr fit

When XPayr is the cleaner choice

XPayr eliminates custodial Speed account balances with 99.5% direct self-custodial wallet settlement, caps gateway fees at a flat 0.5% across 9+ chains (Base, Arbitrum, Solana, TRON, Polygon, BSC, Ethereum, BTC, Arc), and ships an official 21-tool MCP server and ES256 License Kit.

  • SaaS, AI, and e-commerce teams wanting direct non-custodial USDC/USDT/EURC settlement.
  • Developers building on Next.js (/plugins/nextjs), FastAPI (/plugins/python-fastapi), and MCP (/agent-commerce).
  • Creators selling wallet-bound licenses at 0.5% (/license-kit).
Competitor fit

When Speed (TrySpeed) may still win

Speed fits Lightning-focused merchants comfortable maintaining a custodial Speed wallet balance.

  • Merchants specifically seeking a hosted Bitcoin Lightning custodial wallet dashboard.
Evaluation path: run a free XPayr testnet checkout, compare the invoice amount, 0.5% gateway fee, token/network, transaction hash, webhook event, and dashboard record against the flow you use today.
🛡️ Calculate Chargeback & Reserve Savings 🧮 0.5% Fee Calculator 📦 Batch Payout Planner 🔑 ES256 License Verifier ⚡ Live System Status
FAQ

Questions before choosing

Is XPayr cheaper than Speed (TrySpeed)?

XPayr charges a flat 0.5% gateway fee per successful payment before chain gas or route costs. The right comparison depends on the competitor flow, conversion settings, network fees, settlement model, and merchant volume.

When should a merchant choose XPayr?

XPayr eliminates custodial Speed account balances with 99.5% direct self-custodial wallet settlement, caps gateway fees at a flat 0.5% across 9+ chains (Base, Arbitrum, Solana, TRON, Polygon, BSC, Ethereum, BTC, Arc), and ships an official 21-tool MCP server and ES256 License Kit.

When might Speed (TrySpeed) still be better?

Speed fits Lightning-focused merchants comfortable maintaining a custodial Speed wallet balance.

Does XPayr support AI agents and the Model Context Protocol (MCP) compared with Speed (TrySpeed)?

Yes. XPayr provides an official 21-tool MCP server (@xpayr/mcp-server on NPM and io.github.xpayrcom/xpayr-mcp-server on the Official Anthropic MCP Registry) plus policy-controlled AI agent payment intents with human-in-the-loop approval guardrails.