Gateway comparison

XPayr vs Radom

A direct comparison for merchants evaluating crypto checkout, wallet settlement, stablecoin rails, fees, API/webhooks, testnet evaluation, and operational payment records.

Test XPayr on testnet Read alternative page
TL;DR

Choose by operating model, not just feature count.

Switch when you want flat 0.5% pricing across all features, Direct Exchange QR (Binance/Bybit) conversion, 20 CMS/hosting plugins, and 21-tool MCP + A2A agent support.

Pricing snapshot

Fee comparison needs context.

Radom offers Web3 SaaS billing and checkout links starting around 0.5%–1.5%+ depending on billing features, smart-contract pulls, and enterprise plan tiers.

XPayr charges a flat 0.5% gateway fee per successful transaction before network gas, swap, bridge, or third-party route costs.

Radom pricing
At a glance

Where each platform fits

Decision areaXPayrRadom
All-inclusive pricing Flat 0.5% across Checkout, Subscriptions, POS, License Kit & x402 ($0/mo). Feature-tiered pricing (higher rates on subscriptions/invoicing tiers).
Exchange QR buyer reach Built-in Direct Exchange QR + 1% (max $0.50) withdrawal fee tolerance. Primarily Web3 wallet-connect & ERC-20 allowance focus.
Ecosystem & CMS plugins 20 ready integrations (WooCommerce, Magento 2, Shopware, WHMCS, Pterodactyl, Next.js). Focused on hosted links, API, and select SaaS billing flows.
Autonomous AI protocols 21-tool MCP (/mcp), Google A2A v1.0 (/.well-known/agent.json), HTTP 402. Standard REST API and webhooks.
AI Agent & MCP Server Integration Official 21-tool Model Context Protocol server (@xpayr/mcp-server on NPM & Official Anthropic MCP Registry io.github.xpayrcom/xpayr-mcp-server), OpenAPI 3.1.0 playground (api-docs.xpayr.com), and policy-controlled AI agent commerce. Check official provider documentation for current AI agent or MCP protocol support.
XPayr fit

When XPayr is the cleaner choice

XPayr delivers a flat 0.5% across every product (checkout, recurring billing, POS, batch payouts, HTTP 402, ES256 License Kit) with zero SaaS tier gates, plus TRON TRC-20, TON, Circle Arc, Direct Exchange QR tolerance, and an official 21-tool MCP server.

  • SaaS, AI APIs, and software creators combining subscriptions (/recurring-billing) with ES256 License Kit (/license-kit).
  • Global merchants whose customers pay from Binance, Bybit, OKX, Phantom, or Tonkeeper.
  • Stores running WooCommerce, Shopify, Laravel, Next.js, FastAPI, WHMCS, or Pterodactyl.
Competitor fit

When Radom may still win

Radom fits EVM subscription SaaS teams already locked into Radom-specific allowance billing contracts.

  • EVM-only teams already integrated with Radom smart-contract pull allowances.
Evaluation path: run a free XPayr testnet checkout, compare the invoice amount, 0.5% gateway fee, token/network, transaction hash, webhook event, and dashboard record against the flow you use today.
🛡️ Calculate Chargeback & Reserve Savings 🧮 0.5% Fee Calculator 📦 Batch Payout Planner 🔑 ES256 License Verifier ⚡ Live System Status
FAQ

Questions before choosing

Is XPayr cheaper than Radom?

XPayr charges a flat 0.5% gateway fee per successful payment before chain gas or route costs. The right comparison depends on the competitor flow, conversion settings, network fees, settlement model, and merchant volume.

When should a merchant choose XPayr?

XPayr delivers a flat 0.5% across every product (checkout, recurring billing, POS, batch payouts, HTTP 402, ES256 License Kit) with zero SaaS tier gates, plus TRON TRC-20, TON, Circle Arc, Direct Exchange QR tolerance, and an official 21-tool MCP server.

When might Radom still be better?

Radom fits EVM subscription SaaS teams already locked into Radom-specific allowance billing contracts.

Does XPayr support AI agents and the Model Context Protocol (MCP) compared with Radom?

Yes. XPayr provides an official 21-tool MCP server (@xpayr/mcp-server on NPM and io.github.xpayrcom/xpayr-mcp-server on the Official Anthropic MCP Registry) plus policy-controlled AI agent payment intents with human-in-the-loop approval guardrails.